UPPER LAKE, Calif. – On Wednesday night the boards of the Upper Lake Union Elementary School District and the Upper Lake Union High School District took the next steps in the process of deciding whether or not to unify into one district.
The third joint meeting of the two boards this year saw all 10 board members approve the final three criteria that state education code requires them to consider.
Present at the hourlong meeting were several community members and parents, as well as Lake County Superintendent of Schools Brock Falkenberg; Michelle Buell, senior director of business services for the Lake County Office of Education; and County Board of Education members David Browning, Mark Cooper and Pat Hicks, who also compose the Committee on School District Organization that is anticipated to take its steps in the process this summer.
Altogether, the boards have approved the nine main criteria; state education code includes a 10th as a catch-all if the districts want to add in their own special considerations. But that hasn't happened in this case.
The three criteria approved unanimously Wednesday are as follows: that the unification would not result in a significant increase in school housing costs, that the unification is primarily designed for purposes other than to significantly increase property values and that bringing the two districts together would not cause a substantial adverse effect on the fiscal management or fiscal status of the new unified district.
During public comment, Sara Sanchez – a mother of four students of the Upper Lake schools – told the boards that it would be great if all of her children had the same days off, and their records followed them in one district.
“It would be very helpful for us if we could combine it all into one,” said Sanchez, noting that other parents have expressed the same opinion.
“I know this is the furthest that we have come in the unification process,” and Sanchez said she hoped it made it through, as she believes there is no reason for the two districts to be separate.
Another man in the audience also expressed his support for the process, applauding the boards for sitting down and discussing the matter.
He added that if unification is better for students, the districts should do it.
One community member who doesn't believe that unification is the right path is Walt Christensen, who also was in the audience and questioned the board during the meeting about various aspects of the process.
In response to a question previously posed by board members about the potential cost for hiring an interim superintendent during the unification process, Upper Lake Elementary Chief Business Official Becky Jeffries said she did projected costs for six-, 12- and 18-month periods.
For the six-month period, it would range between just over $57,000 to $72,750, and could range between $190,000 and $241,000 for a year and a half, Jeffries said.
Hiring an interim superintendent would be up to the new board that will be appointed to carry out the work of forming the new district, Jeffries noted.
Upper Lake Elementary Principal/Superintendent Valerie Gardner added that it's common practice in unifications to use an interim superintendent.
Upper Lake High School Board member Rich Swaney said they have discussed hiring a retired annuitant for six months to cover the position.
The board went over the three criteria up for approval briefly before accepting them and moving on to a question raised at the March 25 meeting on unification.
That question was whether the parent teacher organization would continue to run just under the Upper Lake Elementary School and Upper Lake Middle School or if it would now include Upper Lake High School.
The answer is that the PTO may operate separately from the high school or be combined, said Upper Lake High Principal/Superintendent Patrick Iaccino
“It's an entity unto itself,” said Iaccino. “The board has no jurisdiction over the booster club.”
Gardner pointed out that there is an elementary and middle school PTO and one for the high school.
It was then on to a brief review of the draft unification feasibility study. Iaccino said district staffers are in the process of finishing the final report, which will be presented for approval at the last joint meeting next month.
During the discussion, from the audience, Christensen told the boards, “My big objection in this whole process is 10 people make a decision for an entire community,” then five – the new board – will be responsible for fixing something that he said should have gone to the electorate.
“My response is these 10 individuals were elected by the electorate to make those decisions on their behalf,” said Iaccino.
Iaccino said public meetings and open forums were offered to allow the community to weigh in on the unification proposal.
Christensen responded that the 10 board members hadn't been elected for the sole purpose of unifying the two school districts, but were put in office to bring to the students of Upper Lake the best education possible.
He said people are leaving the district because that's not happening. “They're not fighting city hall, they're just moving.”
The process ahead
According to the process as it's outlined so far, at the joint meeting May 27 the two district boards will consider the final feasibility study.
They will then have separate June meetings – the high school on June 10 and the elementary school district on June 17 – to consider resolutions to approve the unification proposal.
The Lucerne Elementary School District Board also will meet in June to pass a “Thompson resolution” – named for a 1994 bill written by then-state Sen. Mike Thompson, now a congressman, to allow a high school district to unify without affecting all of its feeder elementary districts. That will enable Lucerne to opt out of taking part in the unification.
Once the study and resolutions are finalized, they would be given to Falkenberg, who would then have 30 days to vet the documents and present them to the Lake County Board of Education, sitting jointly as the Committee on School District Organization.
The county board would have up to 120 days to hold hearings and do its work before making a recommendation to the California Department of Education Board for final approval this fall.
On Wednesday night Falkenberg gave the boards an update on what the part of the process he's involved might look like. He has consulted with other county superintendents who have been through the process in order to be prepared.
He said if the districts indicate they want to unify, his office would pursue an election waiver which would allow him to appoint the board to represent the new district. “It would initially be an interim board.”
Falkenberg said he believed a thorough vetting process was needed for the new board, including an application process and an advisory panel.
Adding that he respects the voters, he said he would take into account who they have elected by giving special consideration to current board members.
Iaccino said the interim board would be appointed in December. From that point until the end of June, that board would work alongside the current boards of the two existing districts.
He said they are waiting for a response from the county clerk regarding whether they can remain on an odd-year election cycle, meaning that there wouldn't be a board election until November 2017. If they have to be on the even-year cycle, the election would be in November 2016.
Iaccino said that the top three vote getters would have four-year terms, with the next two finishers getting two-year terms.
Falkenberg said that in July he would prepare to submit a waiver to the state to allow the unification to go forward even though there are less than 1,500 students. He would aim to be on the California Board of Education's September agenda for approval.
Hicks told the board that she was concerned about the brief window for the county board to get its work done, including holding public meetings. “It's going to be very, very tight in those months.”
Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.