CLEARLAKE, Calif. – Striking Lake Transit Authority bus drivers and union representatives held what amounted to a pep rally on Friday, highlighted by a call to replace the transit line's operator.
Teamsters Local 665 called for the replacement of Washington-based Paratransit Services as service provider, alleging that it is not fulfilling service requirements that the union said are spelled out in a 2007 operator's agreement with Lake Transit Authority.
If “the service required under the operator's agreement with the LTA has not been fulfilled during this past week then this operator should be penalized and financially sanctioned … or perhaps replaced,” the union said in a written statement.
However, Lake Transit General Manager Mark Wall said Friday that the performance clause that the union was citing doesn't exist.
“They have not requested a copy of the contract,” he said. “I don’t think they've read the contract.”
The rally, held in front of Clearlake City Hall, was attended by about 20 or so striking employees and Teamsters Local 665, and presided over by Ralph Miranda, the union's president and North Bay director, and Mark Gleason, secretary-treasurer and principal officer of Local 665.
Union members began an indefinite walkout on Monday after rejecting Paratransit Services' latest offer of a 2.2-percent raise. The union is seeking a 2.4-percent increase.
The call for replacement of Lake Transit was put forth in a written statement distributed to the striking drivers and read aloud by Miranda at the Friday event.
Both Miranda and Gleason, as well as most of the drivers, also were critical of Lake Transit and Wall, accusing the agency and Wall of siding with Paratransit Services in the ongoing strike by the Teamsters.
“They (LTA) were staying out of it and letting collective bargaining take its course,” said Gleason. “But in the last couple of days Mark was definitely leaning in Paratransit's favor.”
Gleason's reference was to Wall's allegation earlier this week that Teamster representatives and striking employees were violating the Homeland Security Act.
“I don't know if he (Wall) is speaking for the entire (LTA) board, but I'm very disappointed that he's siding with Paratransit authorities in saying that we should recognize their terms,” said Gleason. “We're just not going to do that. He should be doing more to helps us resolve this dispute than finger-pointing.”
Wall, reached by a phone call to his office, denied siding with Paratransit Services.
“If they want to make that case, fine,” he said. “But I remain neutral. The LTA remains neutral.”
He added, “The only concern I have is the long-term well-being of the transit system,” noting he's been with the system since it started 17 years ago.
The contract spells out that the transit agency can't be held responsible for events beyond its control, including natural disasters and labor strikes, Wall said.
“There's nothing I can do other than make sure that the contractor is following the law,” said Wall, adding that he believes Paratransit Services is doing just that.
Wall said he's also concerned about safety of passengers.
Paratransit Services said Friday that union members are creating safety issues by obstructing buses and staff vehicles from exiting or entering the transit facility off Highway 53.
Miranda said this week that Teamsters are participating in “ambulatory picketing,” which entails following buses on their routes and picketing them at stops.
The center of the dispute
The dispute between Paratransit Services and Local 665 centers on a temporary suspension of yearly “step” increases transit employees agreed to make to help the help the county's sagging economy. Now the employees feel that the increases should be resumed.
“It's not about the money, which amounts to only 25 cents an hour,” said Sandy Frarish, a former transit supervisor for eight years in Yolo County who been worked in Lake County the last two years. “But we gave up the step increases and now they won't give them back to us. With more longevity you get a little step increase every year and you become a better person for the company, but (Paratransit) doesn't see it that way. It's totally unfair that they won't negotiate.”
However, in a Friday statement, Paratransit Services maintained that it never promised to reinstate the step increases.
The Friday union statement presented by Miranda and Gleason spelled the issues out in harsher terms. It accuses Paratransit Services of not meeting the performance standards it agreed to in 2007.
“Yet this operator continues to bill and accept funding from LTA, the state of California and the federal government, by claiming each day that 'phantom' bus service is providing a benefit to the citizens of Lake County,” the statement reads.
But, the union statement points out, Lake Transit buses are not running and the striking drivers are not going to drive the buses without a sincere offer from management.
There was an unsubstantiated report that one woman bus driver stopped her vehicle and exited it in the midst of a run in sympathy with the strike.
The union on Friday called for intervention by the county's elected officials.
For his part, Wall said he doesn't see the Teamsters moving to end the strike.
Wall said he has asked Paratransit Services for a plan by early next week that will give a timeline for restoration of several routes that have been scaled back or stopped temporarily during the strike.
Once the document is ready, Wall intends to present it to the community, adding he will expect Paratransit Services to stand by the plan.
Elizabeth Larson contributed to this report.
Email John Lindblom at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .