Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Clean California initiative hit a major milestone of removing one million cubic yards of litter from the state’s roadsides since the program’s inception less than 15 months ago.
That’s more than 16,700 tons of litter — enough to build two stacks of trash from the Earth’s surface to beyond the International Space Station, 250 miles in orbit.
“California is the most beautiful place in the world, and we need to do more to keep our communities clean and safe,” said Gov. Newsom. “With an investment of over $1 billion, Clean California projects are cleaning up our neighborhoods and enriching our public spaces by removing litter and debris from our roadsides throughout our state.”
Clean California is a sweeping $1.1 billion, multiyear clean-up effort led by Caltrans to remove trash, create thousands of jobs, and engage communities to transform public spaces.
Since Clean California launched in July 2021, Caltrans has removed 300 percent more litter from the state highway system compared to 2020 and hired 759 new team members, including maintenance workers who collect litter and remove graffiti.
“Removing 1 million cubic yards of trash from our roadways is a very big step toward fulfilling Governor Newsom’s vision for Clean California. I salute the many communities joining this effort to make our state cleaner, safer and more beautiful,” said Caltrans Director Tony Tavares.
Along with roadside cleanup efforts, Caltrans has held 180 free Dump Day events statewide to allow Californians to safely dispose of bulk items, collecting more than 18,000 tires and 5,000 mattresses.
Clean California also offers a $250 monthly volunteer incentive stipend through the Adopt-A-Highway program, increasing highway adoptions by nearly 1,000. These highway adopters have collected 3,000 cubic yards of trash during the past 15 months.
Clean California grants have funded 231 projects to revitalize and beautify underserved communities, some of which are already complete and now sources of community pride. The recently enacted state budget includes $100 million to fund another round of Clean California local grant projects.
For more information on how to transform your community and become a part of Clean California, visit CleanCA.com.
LUCERNE, Calif. — Lucerne Elementary School District is among 11 school districts that have been awarded a total of $33.7 million to repair or construct early education facilities throughout the state.
On Thursday, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced the grants, which are part of the $490 million Access California Preschool, Transitional Kindergarten and Full-Day Kindergarten Facilities Grant Program.
“California is committed to increasing opportunity and equity for every student across the state, regardless of their Zip code or background,” said Gov. Newsom. “We’ve made major strides over the years to expand services to support young children and their families and provide access to free, high-quality, inclusive prekindergarten education for all children. This funding is critical for school districts to construct the facilities necessary to support the expanded learning time.”
The program, administered by the Department of General Services Office of Public School Construction, provides funding to school districts that lack the facilities to provide full-day programs for preschool, transitional kindergarten and full-day kindergarten.
Forty-seven projects for 44 school districts — including Lucerne Elementary, the only Lake County District — were initially funded in the 2019-20 fiscal year to create 147 new Title V compliant classrooms.
In that first round, the State Allocation Board at its October 2019 meeting apportioned $1,683,516 for Lucerne Elementary.
Due to its successful implementation, the program was expanded to include preschool and transitional kindergarten facilities.
At its meeting on Wednesday, the State Allocation Board awarded approximately $33.7 million for 11 projects within 11 school districts statewide.
The projects are located within Lake, Kern, Kings, Merced, Monterey and Tulare counties.
In this latest round, Lucerne Elementary received $2,018,191, according to the meeting documents.
The state matching funds for program projects are distributed to local school districts to help finance new school construction projects or the retrofit of existing classrooms, the Department of General Services reported.
State officials said funding priority is given to school districts that lack financial resources to provide a local match and/or are located in an underserved community.
Lucerne Elementary Superintendent Megan Grant said the early education grant is for the construction of two new transitional kindergarten classrooms.
“We are excited to continue to expand our school capacity with brand-new classrooms,” Grant said.
The Office of Public School Construction will distribute the funds to eligible school districts in two phases.
The first phase provides funding to assist school districts in the design of the project, and the second phase provides funding to assist in the construction of the project.
Additional funding is expected to be allocated at the State Allocation Board’s October meeting.
Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.
LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — The Clearlake City Council joined with the Clearlake Police Department last week in welcoming two new police officers and a dispatcher to serve the city.
The swearing-in of the news police department members took place at the start of the council’s Sept. 15 meeting.
Lt. Martin Snyder introduced Amanda Waller, the new dispatcher, and officers Jesus Meza and Hector Sepulveda.
Waller was raised in Lake County, is a graduate of Middletown High School and lives in Clearlake. Snyder said her hobbies are painting, drawing and hiking, and she enjoys spending time with family and loved ones.
Meza is from Porterville in Tulare County and graduated from the police academy in July. He enjoys skateboarding, video games, and time with family, friends and his girlfriend, Snyder said.
Sepulveda, who is from Cutler, also is from Tulare County and graduated from the police academy in July. Snyder said he likes to lift weights, swim and ride ATVs, and Clearlake reminds him of the town where he grew up.
Lt. Tim Hobbs administered the oath of office to the three before family members were welcomed to pin on the officers’ badges.
In other news at the Sept. 15 meeting, the council presented a proclamation declaring Sept. 23 as Native American Day; heard a presentation on the second phase of the Lake County Recreation Center Feasibility Study and supported moving forward to the next steps; approved a mutual aid agreement between the cities of Clearlake, Lakeport, Fort Bragg, Point Arena, Ukiah and Willits; and voted in support of an amendment to the agreement with Pacific Gas and Electric for the use of the community/senior center for emergencies not connected to public safety power outages.
Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.
CLEARLAKE, Calif. — Many great dogs are waiting for their new homes at Clearlake Animal Control.
The City of Clearlake Animal Association also is seeking fosters for the animals waiting to be adopted.
Call the Clearlake Animal Control shelter at 707-273-9440, or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to inquire about adoptions and schedule a visit to the shelter.
Visit Clearlake Animal Control on Facebook or on the city’s website.
The following dogs are available for adoption. New additions are at the top.
‘Mikey’
“Mikey” is a male German shepherd mix with a short brown and tan coat.
He has been neutered.
He is dog No. 51012855.
‘Andy’
“Andy” is a male American pit bull mix with a short gray and white coat.
He is dog No. 48995415.
‘Babs’
“Babs” is a female Labrador retriever mix with a short black coat.
She has been spayed.
She is dog No. 49505856.
‘Bear’
“Bear” is a male Labrador retriever-American pit bull mix with a short charcoal and fawn coat.
He has been neutered.
He is dog No. 48443153.
‘Big Phil’
“Big Phil” is a 13-year-old male American pit bull terrier mix with a blue coat.
He has been neutered.
He is dog No. 49951647.
‘Buster’
“Buster” is a male pit bull mix with a short tan coat.
He has been neutered.
He is dog No. 50762164.
‘Foxie’
“Foxie” is a female German shepherd with a red, black and white coat.
She has been spayed.
She is dog No. 49702845.
‘Hakuna’
“Hakuna” is a male shepherd mix with a tan coat.
He has been neutered.
He is dog No. 50176912.
‘Hondo’
“Hondo” is a male Alaskan husky mix with a buff coat.
He has been neutered.
He’s dog No. 50227693.
‘Keilani’
“Keilani” is a 3-year-old female German shepherd mix with a black and tan coat.
She has been spayed and she is house trained.
She is dog No. 50427566.
‘Luciano’
“Luciano” is a male Siberian husky mix with a short black and white coat.
He has been neutered.
He is dog No. 50596272.
‘Mamba’
“Mamba” is a male Siberian husky mix with a gray and cream-colored coat.
He has been neutered.
He is dog No. 49520569.
‘Matata’
“Matata” is male shepherd mix with a tan coat.
He has been neutered.
He is dog No. 50176912.
‘Sadie’
“Sadie” is a female German shepherd mix with a black and tan coat.
She has been spayed.
She is dog No. 49802563.
‘Snowball’
“Snowball is a 1 and a half year old male American Staffordshire terrier mix with a short white coat.
He has been neutered.
He is dog No. 49159168.
‘Teddy’
“Teddy” is a male retriever mix with a cream-colored coat.
He has been neutered.
He is dog No. 49583194.
‘Terry’
“Terry” is a handsome male shepherd mix with a short brindle coat.
He gets along with other dogs, including small ones, and enjoys toys. He also likes water, playing fetch and keep away.
Staff said he is now getting some training to help him build confidence.
He is dog No. 48443693.
‘Willie’
“Willie” is a male German shepherd mix with a black and tan coat.
He has been neutered.
He is dog No. 50596003.
Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.
The California Department of Public Health this week warned school leaders about a new and concerning “rainbow fentanyl” drug that may interest youth.
In a letter to superintendents and charter school administrators, CDPH Director and State Public Health Officer Tomás J. Aragón warned that “rainbow fentanyl” is a potentially fatal drug found in pills and powders in a variety of bright colors, shapes and sizes that could attract young people.
“Rainbow fentanyl can be found in many forms, including pills, powder, and blocks that can resemble sidewalk chalk or candy,” said Dr. Aragón. “Any pill, regardless of its color, shape, or size, that does not come from a health care provider or pharmacist can contain fentanyl and can be deadly."
In its letter, CDPH points to a recent warning from the United States Drug Enforcement Agency that notes the highly addictive and potentially deadly “rainbow fentanyl” has been found in at least 18 states.
Anyone who encounters fentanyl in any form should not handle it and should call 911 immediately.
Recognizing the signs of opioid overdose can save a life. Here are some things to look for:
• Small, constricted “pinpoint pupils.” • Falling asleep or losing consciousness. • Slow, weak, or no breathing. • Choking or gurgling sounds. • Limp body. • Cold and/or clammy skin. • Discolored skin (especially in lips and nails).
It may be hard to tell if a person is high or experiencing an overdose. If you aren’t sure, treat it like an overdose. Here are the steps that could save a life:
• Call 911 immediately. • Administer naloxone, if available. • Try to keep the person awake and breathing. • Lay the person on their side to prevent choking. • Stay with the person until emergency help arrives.
Get more facts about Fentanyl from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Some California schools have created naloxone policies in response to increases in opioid overdoses among youth. Naloxone is a life-saving medication used to reverse an opioid overdose.
CDPH encourages schools that are interested in developing these policies and receiving free naloxone to review relevant regulations and apply for a Statewide Standing Order for Naloxone.
The California Department of Health Care Services Naloxone Distribution Project offers free naloxone to qualified organizations, including schools and universities.
Visit the CDPH Overdose Prevention Initiative site for more information, including resources for adult role models and educators.
LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — Lake County’s unemployment rate ticked up slightly in August, as did the state and national jobless rates.
The Employment Development Department said Lake County’s unemployment rate in August was 4.4%, up from 4.3% in July and 7.2% in August 2021.
The farm industry’s employment increased by 23.1% in a month-over comparison, while the nonfarm category was up by 2.7%.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics said the national unemployment rate in August was 3.7%, up from 3.5% in July and 5.2% in August 2021.
California’s unemployment rate increased in the month of August 4.1% from 3.9% in July, despite the state’s employers adding 19,900 nonfarm payroll jobs to the economy, according to the Employment Development Department. The August 2021 rate was 7%.
California payroll jobs totaled 17,644,600 in August 2022, up 15,980 from July 2022 and up 677,100 from August of last year.
The number of Californians employed in August was 18,564,600, a decrease of 3,900 persons from July’s total of 18,568,500, but up 855,500 from the employment total in August 2021.
The report showed the number of unemployed Californians was 790,900 in August, an increase of 36,300 over the month, but down 549,300 in comparison to August 2021.
August 2022’s 0.2 percentage point gain is the first time since May of 2020 that California’s unemployment rate saw a month-over increase. It was also the 11th consecutive month of nonfarm job gains, which now totals a 690,000 job gain over that time period.
The state has now regained 98.3% (2,711,600) of the 2,758,900 nonfarm jobs lost during March and April of 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Employment Development Department said.
Seven of California’s 11 industry sectors gained jobs in August: Leisure and hospitality; trade, transportation and utilities; professional and business services; education and health services; government; financial activities; and mining and logging.
The “other services” category had no change, while industry sectors that showed declines were manufacturing, construction and information.
Lake County’s unemployment rate earned it the No. 38 ranking statewide among the state’s 58 counties.
San Mateo continued to have California’s lowest jobless rate, 2.1%, while Imperial had the highest, 16.2%.
Lake’s neighboring county jobless rates and ranks were: Colusa, 7.6%, No. 56; Glenn, 4.9%, No. 43; Mendocino, 3.4%, No. 18; Napa and Sonoma, tied at 2.8%, No. 6; and Yolo, 3.4%, No. 18.
In other employment news, the Employment Development Department said that in August there were 310,212 people receiving unemployment insurance benefits, down 6,051 from July 2022 and down 328,764 from August of last year.
Additionally, there were 37,200 new unemployment insurance claims in August 2022, down 2,979 from July 2022 and down 26,353 from August of last year.
Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.
The surviving spouse has important estate administration duties at the death of the first spouse to die (i.e., “the deceased spouse”). These sometimes go neglected until the surviving spouse dies. The surviving spouse needs to examine how the deceased spouse’s assets are titled.
Real properties may be held by a husband and wife as tenants in common, as joint tenancy assets, as community property, as community property with right of survivorship, or as trustee(s) if the asset is held in trust.
Assets held as tenants in common, or by the deceased spouse in his or her name alone, are subject to the deceased spouse’s will or, if no will exists, the laws of intestacy.
Furthermore, during life California law generally presumes that all assets acquired by married people while married and domiciled in California are community property (section 760 Family Code).
This general presumption is rebuttable by a preponderance of the evidence. The presumption applies during the couple’s lifetime and, specifically in divorce or creditor proceedings involving either spouse, but, importantly, does not apply at death at which time the form of title controls (In re Brace (2020) 9 C5th 903).
If the deceased spouse died without a will then the deceased spouse’s separate property goes by intestacy to the deceased spouse’s surviving spouse and children, if relevant. Any community property goes entirely to the surviving spouse by intestacy.
Assets that belong to the deceased spouse individually and require a court order for a surviving spouse to inherit title are still not required to pass through probate. That is true whether or not such assets pass under a will or by intestacy. A so-called spousal property petition can be used to retitle assets from the deceased spouse into the surviving spouse’s name alone.
Other assets may transfer either by right of survivorship or by trust administration. Assets held in trust require private trust administration. Trust administration, however, is not self-executing and has similarities with a court probate administration. Unfortunately, the administration of a joint husband and wife trust often goes ignored by the surviving spouse.
Some married couples have joint trusts that requires the deceased spouse’s share of the trust assets to be transferred into an irrevocable by-pass trust (i.e., a so-called “A-B” Trust) — where the deceased spouse’s assets are held and administered until the death of the surviving spouse — then failing to divide the joint trust at the deceased spouse’s death means bigger problems later on when the surviving spouse dies.
Assets where the surviving spouse while alive could have filed a spousal property petition to remove the deceased spouse from title will require a probate of the surviving spouse’s estate. Only a personal representative of the surviving spouse’s probate can file a spousal property petition to transfer assets from the deceased spouse to the surviving spouse’s estate.
After the surviving spouse has settled the deceased spouse’s estate, the surviving spouse can then more completely update his or her own estate planning. This is work that usually cannot fully be accomplished until the deceased spouse’s name is removed from title to assets.
The foregoing discussion is not legal advice. Consult an attorney if facing these legal issues.
Dennis A. Fordham, attorney, is a State Bar-Certified Specialist in estate planning, probate and trust law. His office is at 870 S. Main St., Lakeport, Calif. He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and 707-263-3235.
The summer of 2022 started with a historic flood in Montana, brought on by heavy rain and melting snow, that tore up roads and caused large areas of Yellowstone National Park to be evacuated.
In between, wildfires raged through California, Arizona and New Mexico on the background of a megadrought in Southwestern U.S. that has been more severe than anything the region has experienced in at least 1,200 years. Near Albuquerque, New Mexico, a five-mile stretch of the Rio Grande ran dry for the first time in 40 years. Persistent heat waves lingered over many parts of the country, setting temperature records.
The United States is hardly alone in its share of climate disasters.
In Pakistan, record monsoon rains inundated more than one-third of the country, killing over 1,500 people. In India and China, prolonged heat waves and droughts dried up rivers, disrupted power grids and threatened food security for billions of people.
In Europe, heat waves set record temperatures in Britain and other places, leading to severe droughts and wildfires in many parts of the continent. In South Africa, torrential rains brought flooding and mudslides that killed more than 400 people. The summer may have come to an end on the calendar, but climate disasters will surely continue.
This isn’t just a freak summer: Over the years, such extreme events are occurring in increasing frequency and intensity.
Climate change is intensifying these disasters
The most recent international climate assessment from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found significant increases in both the frequency and intensity of extreme temperature and precipitation events, leading to more droughts and floods.
A recent study published in the scientific journal Nature found that extreme flooding and droughts are also getting deadlier and more expensive, despite an improving capacity to manage climate risks. This is because these extreme events, enhanced by climate change, often exceed the designed levels of such management strategies.
Extreme events, by definition, occur rarely. A 100-year flood has a 1% chance of happening in any given year. So, when such events occur with increasing frequency and intensity, they are a clear indication of a changing climate state.
The term “global warming” can sometimes be misleading, as it seems to suggest that as humans put more heat-trapping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, the world is going to get a bit warmer everywhere. What it fails to convey is that warming temperatures also lead to a more violent world with more extreme climate disasters, as we saw this past summer.
Climate models showed these risks were coming
Much of this is well-understood and consistently reproduced by climate models.
As the climate warms, a shift in temperature distribution leads to more extremes. The magnitudes of changes in extreme temperature are often larger than changes in the mean. For example, globally, a 1 degree Celsius increase in annual average temperature is associated with 1.2 C to 1.9 C (2.1 Fahrenheit to 3.4 F) of increase in the annual maximum temperature.
In addition, global warming causes changes in the vertical profile of the atmosphere and equator-to-pole temperature gradients, leading to changes in how the atmosphere and ocean move. The temperature difference between equator and the poles is the driving force for global wind. As the polar regions warm at much higher rates then the equator, the reduced temperature difference causes a weakening of global winds and leads to a more meandering jet stream.
Some of these changes can create conditions such as persistent high-pressure systems and atmosphere blocking that favor more frequent and more intense heat waves. The heat domes over the Southern Plains and South in June and the West in September are examples.
The initial warming can be further amplified by positive feedbacks. For example, warming increases snow melt, exposing dark soil underneath, which absorbs more heat than snow, further enhancing the warming.
Warming of the atmosphere also increases its capacity to hold water vapor, which is a strong greenhouse gas. Therefore, more water vapor in the air leads to more warming. Higher temperatures tend to dry out the soil, and less soil moisture reduces the land’s heat capacity, making it easier to heat up.
These positive feedbacks further intensify the initial warming, leading to more heat extremes. More frequent and persistent heat waves lead to excessive evaporation, combined with decreased precipitation in some regions, causing more severe droughts and more frequent wildfires.
This increased humidity leads to heavier rainfall events. In addition, storm systems are fueled by latent heat, or the large amount of energy released when water vapor condenses to liquid water. Increased moisture content in the atmosphere also enhances latent heat in storm systems, increasing their intensity. Extreme heavy or persistent rainfall leads to increased flooding and landslides, with devastating social and economic consequences.
Even though it’s difficult to link specific extreme events directly to climate change, when these supposedly rare events occur with increasing frequency in a warming world, it is hard to ignore the changing state of our climate.
The new abnormal
So this past summer might just provide a glimpse of our near future, as these extreme climate events become more frequent.
To say this is the new “normal,” though, is misleading. It suggests that we have reached a new stable state, and that is far from the truth.
Without serious effort to curb greenhouse gas emissions, this trend toward more extreme events will continue. Things will keep getting worse, and this past summer will become the norm a few years or decades down the road – and eventually, it will seem mild, like one of those “nice summers” we look back on fondly with nostalgia.
An analysis of recent U.S. Census Bureau data shows that parts of the student debt forgiveness plan announced by the administration last month — one of the largest ever — would completely eliminate student debt for a number of borrowers.
The plan would forgive up to $10,000 in federal student debt for individuals making less than $125,000 a year and married couples making less than $250,000 a year. Additionally, the student loans of income-eligible individuals who received Pell grants would be reduced by up to $20,000.
The Census Bureau’s recently released 2021 Survey of Income and Program Participation, or SIPP, provides information about student debt balances as of December 31, 2020. Although loan balances would normally change over two years, pandemic policies allowed borrowers to temporarily pause payments without interest.
In addition, any payments made after March 2020 can be refunded and then forgiven. Because of this, amounts owed in student debt in 2020 can serve as an approximation of loan balances in 2022.
In this article, we investigate who among adults not enrolled in college with at least a high school degree will benefit — and by how much — from this proposed policy, assuming all reported student loans in the SIPP are federal and that no one’s student debt will be reduced by more than $10,000.
Who will benefit from $10,000 in student loan forgiveness?
The 2021 SIPP data show that the plan to reduce student loans by $10,000 would completely wipe out balances for 29.0% of those with student debt and that certain demographic groups would benefit more than others.
Some of the largest reductions are expected among Hispanic individuals with an associate degree. A $10,000 reduction in student loans reduces the percentage with any student debt from 14.4% to 7.7%.
While the estimated erasure of student loans is largest for non-Hispanic associate degree holders who are Black alone (identified as Black through the rest of this story) — from 19.9% to 12.6% — this reduction is not statistically different from the reduction for any other race-by-education group.
Individuals with advanced degrees are expected to experience some of the smallest reductions in student loan holding, varying from 1.6 to 3.2 percentage points across race and ethnic groups. These reductions are also small compared to the percentage who held any student debt before forgiveness.
The likely reasons for the differences by education: larger amounts of debt or higher incomes making them ineligible for loan forgiveness. Advanced-degree holders on average had higher student debt ($69,000) than associate-degree holders ($22,000).
Based on income, the share of advanced-degree holders with student debt eligible for debt forgiveness ranges from 75.6% of non-Hispanics who are neither Black nor White to 85.6% of Black borrowers. People who are neither Black nor White include Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander and mixed-race individuals.
However, over 90% of borrowers with an associate degree in all race groups would qualify.
Women typically earn less than men and are more likely to not only have student debt but to owe more than men. As a result, they may have a harder time paying off student loans.
It’s estimated Black and Hispanic women are expected to experience some of the largest reductions in the percentage with any student loans from the $10,000 relief plan: 5.4 and 4.7 percentage points, respectively.
White men are expected to experience among the smallest reductions (2.4 percentage points).
How much of a difference can $10,000 in student loan relief make?
Because student debt burden is sometimes high relative to income, student loans can go hand in hand with other types of unsecured debt. This means student loan forgiveness is expected to have a significant impact on individuals’ overall unsecured debt burden.
Unsecured debt — such as student, credit card or medical debt — is not backed by an asset the way a house backs a mortgage because lenders cannot repossess someone’s education if the individual fails to pay a student loan.
The $10,000 reduction in student debt would decrease the amount of total unsecured liabilities owed by 33.0% on average of those who have any student debt.
Hispanic individuals with a high school degree but no college degree (43.2%) and associate degrees (38.4%) are expected to experience among the greatest reduction in what they owed in unsecured loans. Non-Hispanic individuals who are neither White nor Black with a high school degree, but no college degree (51.7%) and associate degrees (52.2%) are also expected to experience among the greatest reduction of unsecured amounts owed.
The $10,000 reduction in student loans is expected to have some of the smallest impacts on unsecured amounts owed by those with advanced degrees: between 17.5% and 24.2% in unsecured debt across race and ethnic groups.
Hispanic women (40.4%) are expected to experience among the largest shares of unsecured debt relief.
About the data
The strength of SIPP data — and survey data more generally — does not lie in estimating the total number of borrowers whose student debt will be eliminated entirely or the total dollar amount of outstanding student debt that will be relieved.
Rather, the strength of SIPP data is its rich description of who will benefit and how much of a difference student loan forgiveness might make in the context of student loan borrowers’ assets and other debts.
In addition, SIPP returns to interview the same individuals over the course of several years.
Consequently, future SIPP data will show how student loan forgiveness affected sample members’ student loan balances as well as any subsequent influences on their family formation, business formation, program participation and well-being (financial or otherwise).
SIPP does not ask borrowers whether their student loans are federal or private. Estimates from other sources are that private student loans made up less than 15% of total student debt in 2012. As a result, this research assumes all student loans are federal and this assumption tends to bias the impact on debt burden upwards.
SIPP does not collect information about Pell grant recipients, who would get up to a $20,000 debt relief on federal student loans. This research assumes student debt reduction of no more than $10,000, which tends to bias the impact on debt burden downwards.
We are unable to determine the overall value of the counteracting effects from the above assumptions.
SIPP is a nationally representative, longitudinal survey administered by the Census Bureau that provides comprehensive information on the dynamics of income, employment, household composition and government program participation.
Neil Bennett is an economist in the Census Bureau’s Social, Economic, and Housing Statistics Division. Michael D. King and Mark A. Klee are survey statisticians in the Census Bureau’s Social, Economic, and Housing Statistics Division.
On Sept. 26, 2022, NASA plans to change an asteroid’s orbit.
The large binary asteroid Didymos and its moonlet Dimorphos currently pose no threat to Earth. But by crashing a 1,340-pound (610-kilogram) probe into Didymos’ moon at a speed of approximately 14,000 mph (22,500 kph), NASA is going to complete the world’s first full-scale planetary defense mission as a proof of concept. This mission is called the Double Asteroid Redirection Test, or DART.
I am a scholar who studies space and international security, and it is my job to ask what the likelihood really is of an object crashing into the planet – and whether governments are spending enough money to prevent such an event.
To find the answers to these questions, one has to know what near-Earth objects are out there. To date, NASA has tracked only an estimated 40% of the bigger ones. Surprise asteroids have visited Earth in the past and will undoubtedly do so in the future. Experiments like the DART mission may help prepare humanity for such an event.
The threat from asteroids and comets
Millions of cosmic bodies, like asteroids and comets, orbit the Sun and often crash into the Earth. Most of these are too small to pose a threat, but some can be cause for concern. Near-Earth objects include asteroids and comets whose orbits will bring them within 120 million miles (193 million kilometers) of the Sun.
Astronomers consider a near-Earth object a threat if it will come within 4.6 million miles (7.4 million kilometers) of the planet and if it is at least 460 feet (140 meters) in diameter. If a celestial body of this size crashed into Earth, it could destroy an entire city and cause extreme regional devastation. Larger objects – 0.6 miles (1 kilometer) or more – could have global effects and even cause mass extinctions.
But smaller objects can also cause significant damage. In 1908, an approximately 164-foot (50-meter) celestial body exploded over the Podkamennaya Tunguska River in Siberia. It leveled more than 80 million trees over 830 square miles (2,100 square kilometers). In 2013, an asteroid only 65 feet (20 meters) across burst in the atmosphere 20 miles (32 kilometers) above Chelyabinsk, Russia. It released the equivalent of 30 Hiroshima bombs’ worth of energy, injured over 1,100 people and caused US$33 million in damage.
The likely next asteroid of substantial size to potentially hit Earth is asteroid 2005 ED224. When the 164-foot (50-meter) asteroid passes by on March 11, 2023, there is roughly a 1 in 500,000 chance of impact.
Congress recognized this threat, and in the 1998 Spaceguard Survey, it tasked NASA to find and track 90% of the estimated total of near-Earth objects 0.6 miles (1 kilometer) across or bigger within 10 years. NASA surpassed the 90% goal in 2011.
As of Sept. 18, 2022, astronomers have located 29,724 near-Earth asteroids, of which 10,189 are 460 feet (140 meters) or larger in diameter and 855 are at least 0.6 miles (1 kilometer) across. About 30 new objects are added each week.
We can prevent a disaster only if we know it is coming, and asteroids have sneaked up on Earth before.
A so-called “city-killer” asteroid the size of a football field passed less than 45,000 miles (72,420 kilometers) from Earth in 2019. An asteroid the size of a 747 jet came close in 2021, as did an asteroid 0.6 miles (1 kilometer) wide in 2012. Each of these was discovered only about a day before it passed Earth.
Research suggests that Earth’s rotation creates a blind spot, hiding some asteroids from detection or making them appear stationary. This may be a problem, as some surprise asteroids do not miss us. In 2008, astronomers spotted a small asteroid only 19 hours before it crashed into rural Sudan.
The recent discovery of an asteroid 1.2 miles (2 kilometers) in diameter suggests that there are still big objects lurking.
What can be done?
To protect the planet from cosmic dangers, early detection is key. At the 2021 Planetary Defense Conference, scientists recommended a minimum of five to 10 years’ preparation time to mount a successful defense against hazardous asteroids.
If astronomers find a dangerous object, there are four ways to mitigate a disaster. The first involves regional first-aid and evacuation measures. A second approach would involve sending a spacecraft to fly near a small- or medium-sized asteroid; the gravity of the craft would slowly change the object’s orbit. To change a bigger asteroid’s path, we can either crash something into it at high speed or detonate a nuclear warhead nearby.
The DART mission will be the first-ever attempt to deflect a large asteroid. But this will not be the first time humanity has sent something to an asteroid. NASA’s Deep Space Impact mission crashed a probe into the comet 9P/Tempel in 2005 to take scientific measurements of the comet, and in 2018 Japan’s Hayabusa2 mission collected samples from the asteroid Ryugu and brought them back to Earth, but neither of these was designed as a planetary defense test.
Investing in planetary defense is akin to buying homeowners insurance. The likelihood of experiencing an event that destroys your house is small, yet people buy insurance nonetheless.
If even a single object larger than 460 feet (140 meters) hits the planet, the devastation and loss of life would be extreme. A bigger impact could quite literally wipe out most species on Earth. Even if no such body is expected to hit Earth in the next 100 years, the chance is not zero. In this low-likelihood-versus-high-consequences scenario, investing in protecting the planet from dangerous cosmic objects may give humanity some peace of mind and could prevent a catastrophe.
This is an updated version of a story originally published on March 1, 2022.
On Thursday, the Department of the Interior announced that it has invested over $7.5 million in fiscal year 2022 funding from President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to advance wildfire resilience work and support fuels management projects in California on 9,969 acres of land across the state.
This is part of $103 million allocated by the Department earlier this year to reduce wildfire risk, mitigate impacts and rehabilitate burned areas.
The additional funding will help complete fuels treatments on nearly two million acres nationwide this fiscal year, a substantial increase over the prior year.
“As climate change drives harsher heat waves, more volatile weather, and record drought conditions, we are seeing wildfire seasons turn to wildfire years, threatening communities, businesses, wildlife and the environment,” said Deputy Secretary Tommy Beaudreau. “Through President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, we are investing in California communities, advancing wildfire resilience work across the country, improving resources for the heroic firefighting workforce, and reducing the risk of wildfire.”
The announcement comes as Deputy Secretary Beaudreau is in the Western U.S. this week to highlight how investments from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act are advancing wildfire resilience and drought resilience.
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law is bringing much-needed support to communities across the country to increase the resilience of lands facing the threat of wildland fires and to better support federal wildland firefighters.
The law includes $1.5 billion for the Department of Interior over the next five years to invest in preparedness, fuels management, post-fire restoration and fire science.
It also directs major reforms for federal wildland firefighters, including temporary pay increases and a new occupational series classification more specific to firefighters.
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law investments in wildland fire management in California will increase fuels treatment in areas with high wildfire hazard potential, helping to protect homes and businesses in the wildland-urban interface and public drinking water.
These efforts will promote climate resiliency across landscapes and communities and will employ Tribal members, youth and veterans.
A portion of this year’s wildfire resilience funding from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law will be used to continue development of a wildfire risk mapping and mitigation tool, which is being developed jointly with USDA Forest Service and the National Association of State Foresters.
The tool will assist land managers in collectively identifying potential wildfire risks and sharing planned and accomplished mitigation activities.
The law also provides increased support to the Joint Fire Science Program, an interagency partnership with the USDA Forest Service that funds wildfire science research projects.
The department’s recently released Five-year Monitoring, Maintenance, and Treatment Plan to address wildfire risk laid out a road map for achieving these objectives in coordination with federal, non-federal, and tribal partners. In combination with the USDA Forest Service’s 10-Year Wildfire Crisis Strategy, these plans outline the monitoring, maintenance, and treatment strategy the agencies will use to address wildfire risk, better serve communities, and improve conditions on all types of lands where wildfires can occur.
On Wednesday, Rep. Mike Thompson (CA-05) voted to pass the Presidential Election Reform Act, a significant bipartisan bill that would reform the Electoral Count Act in the wake of the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6 and other illegal attempts by the former president and his allies seeking to overturn the 2020 election.
The bill passed the House by a vote of 229-203. The bill now heads to the United States Senate.
“The former president and his allies sought to overturn the will of the people and subvert the peaceful transfer of power that is fundamental to our democracy,” said Thompson. “These same bad actors conducted a coordinated effort in an attempt to exploit ambiguities in the Electoral Count Act of 1887 to refuse the count of electoral votes and deliver an alternate and false slate of electors. The Presidential Election Reform Act will take vital steps to reform the Electoral Count Act and ensure that the will of the people cannot be overturned.”
The bipartisan Presidential Election Reform Act takes a number of specific steps to safeguard our democracy.
First, this bill would clarify the role of the vice president in the joint session of Congress solely as ceremonial, reaffirming that the vice president does not have the right to reject or alter official state electoral slates.
Second, members of Congress can only object to a state’s electoral count under constitutionally protected reasons, and the objection threshold is raised to one-third of each chamber.
Third, this bill would require governors of each state to transmit to Congress the lawful election results. If the governors fail to carry out these duties, candidates may bring suit in federal court to ensure Congress receives the lawful slate of electors.
Fourth, federal law will make clear that rules governing elections cannot change after the election has occurred, preventing those who are upset with a lawful outcome from retroactively altering the outcome.
Thompson represents California’s Fifth Congressional District, which includes all or part of Contra Costa, Lake, Napa, Solano and Sonoma counties.