I can’t begin to count the times I’ve heard that same statement from people I’ve arrested for driving under the influence (DUI).

Driving under the influence is commonly referred to as “drunk driving,” but you don’t have to be drunk to be arrested for it.

There is a common misconception that if you're not “drunk,” you're OK to drive. Officer Bruce Mulligan once told me, “The word ‘drunk’ has probably killed more people than any modern war.”

The problem with the word is in its definition. Being drunk to some may mean you're unable to stand or even talk sensibly. What is difficult for many people to understand is the concept of being under the influence versus being drunk.

Some people are drunk when they are arrested for DUI, but a majority of those arrested are under the influence of alcohol. In both cases the violation is the same, driving under the influence.

Simply put, being under the influence means that you do not have the same mental capacity or motor control skills that someone who has not been drinking would have. As such, the person who is under the influence causes an unacceptable hazard to the motoring public.

How many drinks is under the influence? One, two, three ... height, weight, metabolism as well as the size of the drink is a factor. The law states that if your blood alcohol concentration is .08 percent or higher then you are definitely under the influence. You may be arrested at a .05 percent, up to .07 percent, depending on the nature and circumstances.

How do you avoid being arrested for DUI? Don’t drink any alcohol before driving.

A good plan before going out, such as the Designated Driver plan, will not only spare you from being arrested, but can save your life or the life of another.

Don’t let pride cloud your judgment and make you another statistic. If you find yourself in a situation, call a friend, call a taxi or make other arrangements to ensure that you don’t drive.

Officer Mike Humble works for the California Highway Patrol's Clear Lake office.

{mos_sb_discuss:4}

While I may not be a resident of Lake County, I am a resident of Colusa County and the National Conservation Area (NCA) designation would not only affect Lake County, but Colusa, Solano, Napa and Yolo counties as well.

But herein lies the problem: Of the 800,000 acres in the Blue Ridge Berryessa region, over 400,000 is privately owned. Arbitrary layers of conservation on privately owned land can affect property values, and many of those landowners have no idea that there is a proposed conservation area that they may be forced to deal with. Environmental groups are not elected by the people and their vision for the region may differ from others who live there. But regardless of their vision, they have no authority to plan for the future of privately owned land.

Private landowners should be able to opt-in to such a designation. While proponents of an NCA designation proclaim that it will protect the region from growth, it creates a mechanism by which local government is bypassed, thus giving the federal government land use authority.

Private property rights are included in the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution because our forefathers understood the basic principles of private property and their role in creating the American dream in a capitalistic society.

Over the years the environmental movement has stripped many landowners of these rights through government intrusion and the Endangered Species Act. The acquisition of private property for “public good” under the guise of protecting the environment is only a scare tactic. Landowners, farmers and ranchers have been good stewards of their land for many decades and the government and environmental groups have no right to impose regulations on private landowners that have the potential to put them out of business.

It is critical that the public understands that private property rights need to be protected and that programs that undermined those rights need to be exposed. In our nation and right in our backyard, a deceptive land grab is being pursued to further the environmental agenda, and agricultural and our rural economies are the innocent victims that are caught in the crossfire.

So why the use of scare tactics? What is the big unknown fear that we need to be protected from? Development? The fear that landowners will sell out to the highest bidder is a real threat, but it is also someone’s right to sell if farming or ranching is no longer economically viable for them. Investing in programs that help keep farming and ranching viable is the way to prevent development not additional environmental and government regulations and fees.

Also, it’s not surprising that environmental groups are supporting such a concept. The NCA designation will create an influx of money to the region, and that means that local environmental groups will be able receive grants to “preserve” the region and further their agenda.

The goal of an NCA designation is land acquisition and federal land use authority. This region has been protected by private landowners for over 100 years, and who is to say that the federal government can do a better job managing the region?

It seems disingenuous for the proponents of such a designation, who claim to want to preserve the region for future generations, to want to put those future generations deeper and deeper into debt. And while there may be a growing number of organizations that want to support this designation, there are a growing number of landowner, elected officials, nonprofit organizations, ranchers and farmers who are opposed to such an egregious violation of private property rights.

Public awareness and knowledge of the issue is the only way to protect our communities. We are a nation that was built on the “land of free and home of the brave” and private property rights are one of the founding principles that make our county so great.

Ashley Indrieri is the executive director of Family Water Alliance, a nonprofit grassroots organization that advocates for private property rights, water rights and the sustainability of agriculture for rural north state communities.

{mos_sb_discuss:4}

Well, I happen to be an advocate of business networking – something that is NOT very common in Lake County. In the six years I have lived in the area I have seen nonprofit fundraisers canceled or restructured due in part to a lack of consideration of people. There is a serious lack in caring and connection here that is "off the charts." I am not sure if the problem is that people have decided they:

1) Don't NEED to CARE about anyone's business other than their own; or,

2) Do not know HOW TO CARE about anyone's business other than their own.

Make no mistake, willing to CARE and knowing HOW TO CARE is important. I plan to be a featured speaker at the upcoming Middletown Area Town Hall meeting on Thursday, Feb. 14 at 7 p.m. in the Middletown High School Multi-Use Room. I plan to address this issue in the process of sharing tools which I believe can move Middletown forward in such a way that the town truly becomes the "Gateway to Lake County." That is to say, Middletown actually becomes a destination rather than a drive-thru to somewhere else.

Caring matters. What would the intensive care unit be within a hospital if no one really cared? Answer: a place to die.

In 2006, I approached two well-known Middletown organizations to ask if they would like to help me do something special for the town's annual western festival, "Middletown Days." The idea was to bring the Fox News Channel to Middletown to cover the festival. Neither organization showed any interest. Put another way, they did not CARE.

Since the adults would not help me, I sought the help of local high school students. Had I simply TOLD the students what to do, their answer would probably have been, "No deal." But, we negotiated with one another. For example, the kids would say, "We'll write the letters, but you provide the envelopes and postage" to which I responded, "Done."

I actually was able to "connect" with 30 high school students. They understood the vision I had for the town. They actually WANTED to help MAKE it come to pass. There was no community service credit attached to getting their help. Each student was simply a volunteer. To make a long story short, the students succeeded in bringing Fox News Correspondent Adam Housley to Middletown to address the parade crowd and get this event mentioned on the network news, June 17th of 2006.

It is important you understand Fox News did not come to Middletown simply because 30 students wrote letters to the network. No, Fox came because those 30 students set into motion a campaign that had caring people around the world writing and calling the network on behalf of the effort initiated by those young people. The students actually engaged in a technique known as "pay it forward" or "netweaving." The students connected with caring people around the world. Those caring people went out of their way to contact Fox News on behalf of those students. Why? Because the student effort "connected" with those adults in such a way that the project became an adult desire as well as a student desire.

It has been said that nothing succeeds like success. The following year when students were once again asked to help spread news about "Middletown Days," it was not just 30 letters that got written. It was 110. And, it was not just high school students that wanted to participate. Middle school children wanted in on the action as well. Teachers were so impressed that this time around every student participating in the business letter-writing program was given community service credit toward graduation.

Meanwhile, a Middletown organization was offering students the opportunity to participate in a T-shirt drawing contest. The winning artist would have his or her artwork displayed on the famous, "Middletown Days T-Shirt," which is always a big seller during the annual western festival in Middletown. An article about the contest was published in the local newspaper. A personal appeal was made to the students at the high school.

But, something was wrong with this approach. There was no serious "connection" made with the students. They were simply given marching orders and expected to carry them out. Why should the students care about the T-shirt drawing contest, anyway? Because the adults told them they should? Was it merely a coincidence that only one person out of the entire high school volunteered to participate in the contest?

Make no mistake, good intentions, are not good enough. Both CARING and knowing HOW TO CARE are crucial in life. For the most part, no one reads the newspaper, listens to the radio or watches television for the advertising. Why then do people pay attention? They pay attention for the news and entertainment value. But, the advertising is there to pay the bills. But, when the advertising CONNECTS with the audience in the same way the news and entertainment does, something marketers love happens. People start to CARE about the advertising message. Often, people will remember that message long after it has disappeared from the media. I doubt anyone reading this commentary will have a problem completing this line, "Please do not squeeze the ________." (Answer: Charmin').

Insanity has been defined as "doing the same thing over and over again and expecting things to change." If that pretty much sums up your advertising experience in Middletown, the time has come to think "outside the box." Try something new and different. Here are some suggestions:

1) Coop an advertising campaign with a group of businesses. Find a way to coop your advertising needs with a group rather than going it alone.

2) Join Project-Middletown on Ryze.com. This FREE online business network allows you to freely advertise your business every Saturday four different ways – plain text, HTML (pictures), audio clip (radio spot) and video clip (TV spot). Help is also freely available for those who need it. This business networking site is also a great place to get an online education. There are a lot of helpful people from around the world who really do want to help you succeed. Why not get acquainted?

3) Be a featured guest on a free online talk show, like Lake County's own Power Networking. It just might be the best 30 minutes of your day. Call 707-709-8605 for more information.

4) Establish a presence at monthly business mixers. If you cannot attend every mixer, make sure someone shows up to spread your business message on your behalf.

5) Learn how to use Jott.com. Send both email and voicemail to a group of people using only the telephone and making a single toll-free call.

6) Create your own free broadcasting online network with Orb Networks. This can come in extremely handy for folks wanting to make public or online slide show presentations. It is also useful for "placeshifting."

7) Get yourself a Skype account for free Internet calling. This is especially good for people who have a high-speed Internet connection.

8) Learn how to create and utilize an online lens at Squidoo.com – including connecting an Evite.com invitation to it.

Above all, remember to CARE and CONNECT with your community. Life is not all about you and your business. It is all about us.

Helping us helps you. Think "better together."

Lamar Morgan lives in Hidden Valley Lake.

{mos_sb_discuss:4}

If, as a vehicle of discussion, we assume any abstract country at any random time, the humans will, have a language. Volumes have been written on the relative sophistication and beauty and complexity and power of languages. Some will endlessly argue the merits and beauty of the different tongues. I personally feel that some languages are better at expressing some subjects better than 1) they are at expressing other subjects in that same language, and/or are 2) better or worse at expressing some subjects than are other languages. It is my understanding, from readings in Semantics, that most experts fall back to those same general opinions; i.e., some are better at some things and some are better at others.

So, if we were to play pin-the-tale-on-the-donkey at any place on an Earth map, the language story of every culture will be a history of change. If the language (in its present form) is different now than it once was, then something changed it. One possibility is gradual change over time. In my high school in Oklahoma, our English teacher from back east could scarcely understand our speech, yet I am reasonably sure that "time" in provincial isolation was the primary agent of our change. That included our pronunciation of specific words and the general tang we gave to it. The point is, that the Irish, and German, and English, and the broad selections of pioneers who settled the west soon spoke a very different language than what might have been their lot had they stayed at home. After a rather short time, even the English spoken by expatriate Englishmen had little to do with England's standards.

I think reflection will demand that we accept that languages change even when they stay in "A" place with "A" relatively stable population of native speakers. All the more pertains if the population is not static. Exodus, influx, amelioration, and decay push the instability. One or more instability factors have always been present on this continent. Even in the major Indian tongues the records seem to indicate cross tribal pollination in normal times and drastic change in warfare and during migration.

Given that change did, has, and will occur, it seems to me that we must investigate the things that allow one language to change and/or absorb another. That, by the way, is the normal circumstance; trying to outlaw a language usually succeeds in creating parallel languages. At least it is so until schools, commerce, and time finally elects one prevailing variant. But, by that time, the one elected has almost always absorbed a lot of the other.

And the main instruments of change? There are, I think, three:

One very obvious force for change, is FORCE! When people who speak different languages wage war, the victor usually insists on the use of their language, but the extent may vary. Typically the government itself will use the victors tongue. Business, at least major business and business locations, will tend to function as the victors dictate. Official schools will help the transitions by using and promoting the new tongue. But, this "contamination" is hated and resisted by the populace, and, with enough time, the populace will usually end up using mixture of the old and the new and imposed. Example: the English over the Irish. But, isn't it interesting how an Irishman, George Bernard Shaw, out did the English with their own tongue)?

The second is commerce. A major source of change, but much simpler than war. Even merchants, who are of the prevailing major class, will kowtow to the subject language when money dictates. If one grocery store tends to hire employees who can speak the "non-official" language, that portion of the populace will gravitate to that store.

The third instrument of change is birth rate. If minorities outbreed the majority long enough, they become a balance of power even in the use and power of the first two instruments of change. If there are more of the "new language" users in a time of war, they will be solicited or drafted. If the need is dire and present, the military will find ways to speak to them. If they have the buying power, commerce will court them. If there are enough of them, and the majority does not accommodate them, the majority ends up at war with them. Regarding which, ghetto violence is both extended and fueled by this very problem. The language is an audible tag of position. It is not, admittedly, language alone, but if you allow an exploding birth rate in a disenfranchised atmosphere, the results will be, and are, evolved from and do provoke violence. Denying heritage and language within these parameters is a volatile fuse for a very heavy explosive.

All this is preamble to the central question about whether, or not, "they" must learn "our" language. We need, I think, to be careful how we answer. We must be sure that we know and understand who and what "they" are. It is also conducive to all parties if they also know and understand who and what we are.

We also should not ever assume that "our" language is, in fact, ours. It coexists with us, we use it, we learn it, and we may love it, but it belongs to history. It is not "ours." It has, will, and now is changing! The Spanish speakers have already changed it greatly (a great portion of the names and titles of towns, geography, and history in California are identified and titled in Spanish).

And, by the way, the quickest way in the world to kill a given language is any to keep it from growing, changing, discarding old parts, and absorbing the new. French was, at one time, where English is now; it was the common denominator language of the world. But the French, with conceit and condescension, decided their language had to remain pure … so time and the world ignored the French. I’m sure it is concurrent, but as the use of the French language, France concurrently ceased to be the

number one military power in the world. Whether we remain the preeminent military power in the world is yet to be seen, but if we can't collectively admit, welcome, and embrace the growth and change of English, our language, we WILL wind up like France, and that might also be a part of our loss in international politics.

The arguments, answers, anger and instincts of the "good-ole pickup and flag patriots" all display their tendency to proscribe and dictate. It does not work. It will not work. It will, of certainty, fail from within. The argument of being here first and having our own language is, as a justification, specious. If that were not so, we Americans should all be speaking some variant of American Indian. They were here and they had their own language. If military power at the time when the new languages entered had be the valid and driving justification, we would again be speaking Indian. Even without guns, all the native population needed to expel, or kill, or enslave the new comers was the will to do so. If, and to the extend possible, the prior waves of migration of the “native” Americans probably had similar situations as they moved on other native populations.

If we want to perpetuate "our" language, there is only one sure way; we must seduce the new speakers. But, we must absolutely allow for change, growth, expansion, and transition. We must lead with a carrot, not with a stick. Unfortunately, our schools do a very poor job at this. If we do not effectively continue the four hundred year seduction that created (and fuels) what America is … then we will be left trying to force continuity. And that, I think, would not succeed! And even if it did, the result would no longer be the American Dream; it would cease to exist. Stasis can not be forced.

Jim Lyle is a former Lake County Poet Laureate. He now lives in Yountville.

{mos_sb_discuss:4}

Unfortunately, the president’s State of the Union address offered little direction or inspiration for America’s future. His claim that No Child Left Behind is a success drew laughs from Republicans and Democrats alike. And one of the few ideas he had – privatizing public education – is a non-starters on both sides of the aisle.

Like many of my fellow Americans, I am looking for a president who offers bold solutions to problems like climate climate change, our dependency on foreign oil and the millions of Americans without health care. We especially need a president who will bring our troops home as quickly and safely as possible and will implement a diplomatic strategy for quelling and containing violence in Iraq. But most important, we need a president who values bipartisanship and problem-solving over political rhetoric and pandering.

Our nation faces many challenges, but with the right leadership, I am confident that the state of our union can once again be strong. Over the past year, Congress has begun to take our county in a new direction. We’ve made strides toward energy independence, better care for our veterans, lowering the cost of college and improved national security. However, Congress acknowledges we have much more to do. I look forward to working with a president who shares this commitment.

Congressman Mike Thompson represents the First Congressional District, which includes Lake County. Visit his Web site at http://mikethompson.house.gov/.

{mos_sb_discuss:5}

Just as television viewing was declining and people were reporting reading more books, getting more sleep, doing their housework. Just as some of us were hoping for the return of, or at least the reruns of, shows like Sid Caesar, Carol Burnett, Ernie Kovacs, Actors Studio. You know, the Golden Age of television, and the brief golden age of the Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour.

Or maybe you don't know. Once upon a time television shows had heart instead of laugh tracks, and if they told you they were live, they were. Complete with mistakes and bloopers. Nobody was trying to pass off a scripted show as reality. Well, almost nobody. There were nasty incidents like quiz shows which gave favored contestants the answers ahead of time, but people were indignant when those came to light. They didn't just shrug and say “that's television for you” and then keep on watching the same dishonest programs.

The writers have reportedly dropped their proposals for jurisdiction over non-union writers of reality TV and animation, which could be a major breakthrough. Another of their proposals seems more important.

A little integrity, please

It says: “Product placement has existed for a long time, first unpaid and more recently paid placement. Most recently, advertisers seek to have the product mentioned in dialogue, often in the scenes preceding a paid 30-second spot. These product mentions can be clumsy and disruptive to the creative goal of a script. This infringes the creative purview of the writer and defeats the very viewer-engagement the advertisers are counting on. Writers are critical to guarding the creative integrity of the script. If products are integrated, it should be in a way that doesn’t detract from the script.”

We know all about that one in the news business. The occasional advertiser demands a news story about the very same thing they have placed an ad to announce, and the really dumb ones want it on the very same page, not understanding that if they're lucky enough to get it in twice, it will have more impact in different locations. Editors refer to this as selling editorial space, and the good ones don't like it one bit. They fight back.

So, while it's fun to fantasize about the bloated, water-guzzling, Los Angeles basin emptying as thousands of carpenters and hairdressers and seamstresses leave it for lack of work, and about bold maverick producers moving to Lake County, I think I'll stick to hoping the writers hang tough on "guarding the creative integrity of the script." We need all the integrity we can get.

Sophie Annan Jensen lives in Lucerne.

{mos_sb_discuss:4}